Attila Boros vs Noah Thurner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 12:39 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Boros vs N. Thurner

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Boros 1 - 0 Thurner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Attila Boros winning 2 and Noah Thurner winning 0. The last match between Attila Boros and Noah Thurner was at the M15 Slovenska Bistrica, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Attila Boros getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Boros | 1 |
| Thurner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Slovenska Bistrica(08-07-25)
A. Boros vs N. Thurner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.71% (102-66) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (104-130) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Boros vs N. Thurner Match Preview:
- Second Serve Effectiveness: Recently, Boros has won 49.74% of second serve points, surpassing Thurner's 41.98%. Is this indicative of a stronger serve game for Boros? It seems so, given the high correlation with match outcomes.
- Return Game Comparison: Thurner excels in returning opponent's second serves with a 44.76% success rate, compared to Boros’s 40.6%. Initially returning the opponent’s serve also favors Thurner, with a 29.8% success rate against Boros’s 25.81%.
- Handling Break Points: Who handles pressure better in break point situations? Thurner has a slight edge, saving 56.25% of break points, whereas Boros saves 55.28%.
- Match Winning Rates: Boros holds a stronger winning percentage over the past year at 65.22%, while Thurner has managed 57.81%. Could this suggest Boros's recent form is more reliable?
- Favorite Surface: Both players find clay favorable; however, Boros has a higher win rate of 63% on this surface compared to Thurner’s 46%.
- Competition Level: Both primarily compete in Futures/Satellite events, but Boros's win rate is higher at 65.22%, illustrating a trend of stronger performances.
- Opponent Quality: Thurner has faced tougher opponents on paper, with an average opponent ranking of 255.34, compared to Boros’s 285.93.
- Deciding Set Performance: Boros seems more resilient in deciding sets, winning 50% compared to Thurner’s 33%, which might influence live game predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: Boros converts break points more efficiently, scoring on 42.5% of their opportunities, while Thurner converts 36.47%.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match, several factors lean in Boros's favor. Boros’s superior second-serve points won and higher breakpoint conversion rate illustrate a sharper competitive edge during key moments.
While Thurner demonstrates stronger return game statistics, Boros’s ability to win more matches and succeed under pressure in deciding sets suggests an overall resilience and winning mentality. Furthermore, Boros’s better performance on clay and overall tournament victories provide a solid argument for their potential triumph.
Considering all factors, Boros appears to have a slight edge and is more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis face-off.
Attila Boros vs Noah Thurner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Boros vs N. Thurner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:28:27 | Average Match Time | 1:28:27 |
| 67% (37/55) | 1st Serve % | 69% (43/62) |
| 73% (27/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 72% (13/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (27/62) | Return Points Win % | 27% (15/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Boros Recent Matches Played
N. Thurner Recent Matches Played

A. Boros vs N. Thurner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.71% (102/66) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (104/130) |
| 60.00% (225/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.67% (238/272) |
| 53.77% (1989/1710) | Games Win/Loss | 48.70% (2420/2549) |
| 57.41% (31/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.07% (32/39) |
| 63.37% (64/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (56/72) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 389 | Aces Total | 320 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 224 | Total Double Faults | 459 |
| 1:5:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 292.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 228.98 |
| 59% (4145/6993) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4642/6886) |
| 68% (2800/4145) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3067/4642) |
| 50% (1432/2848) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (989/2244) |
| 43% (299/699) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (257/604) |
| 39% (2792/7123) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2585/6766) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.45% (102/64) | Futures W/L | 44.44% (104/130) |
| 61% (101/166) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (104/232) |
| 53% (29/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (33/69) |
| 46% (19/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (14/44) |
| 88% (101/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (117/97) |
| 12% (101/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (117/20) |
| 18% (67/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (117/7) |